An International Journal Clinical Rhinology

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Study of the Anatomical Variations in the Middle Meatus on Nasal Endoscopy

SS Bist, Sarita Mishra, Vinish Agrawal, Namita Kabdwal

Keywords : Anatomical variations,Diagnostic nasal endoscopy,Middle meatus

Citation Information : Bist S, Mishra S, Agrawal V, Kabdwal N. Study of the Anatomical Variations in the Middle Meatus on Nasal Endoscopy. Clin Rhinol An Int J 2013; 6 (1):16-21.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10013-1142

Published Online: 00-04-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction

The anatomical variations of the lateral wall of nose may create technical difficulties during surgery and increase predisposition for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Various cadaveric and radiological studies have been carried out to identify the variations of critical landmarks in sinonasal anatomy. However, studies analyzing the nasal endoscopic examination of living patients are scarce.

Objective

The aim of the study was to compare the anatomical variations in the middle meatus of patients having CRS with that of normal population.

Materials and methods

This was a prospective clinical study, where 700 subjects (1,400 middle meatus) were subjected to diagnostic nasal endoscopy, over a period of 2 years. A total of 350 subjects each with CRS and normal population were included in the case and control group, respectively. Endoscopic examination of nasal cavity was done to observe the middle meatus configuration.

Results

The anatomical variations in the case group were significantly higher that of control. The most common atypical anatomical presentation in both the case and control group were atypical agger nasi (14 vs 7%, p-value = 0.0001), concha bullosa in middle turbinate (12 vs 9%, p-value = 0.0809), medially projected uncinate process (10 vs 4%, p-value = 0.0001), and sausage shaped ethmoid bulla (18 vs 10%, p-value = 0.0001). Interestingly, opening of ethmoid bulla was also observed in both the groups.

Conclusion

The prevalence of anatomic variations is significantly higher in the case group. However, the detection of a single anatomical variant itself does not establish the genesis of pathophysiology of CRS. Familiarity with such anatomy is important to optimize surgical treatment of sinus disease, while avoiding complications.

How to cite this article

Bist SS, Varshney S, Bhagat S, Mishra S, Agrawal V, Kabdwal N. Study of the Anatomical Variations in the Middle Meatus on Nasal Endoscopy. Clin Rhinol An Int J 2013;6(1):16-21.


PDF Share
  1. CT scan study of the prevalence of sinus involvement and nasal anatomic variations in 196 children. Rhinology 1990;28:177-84.
  2. CT Evaluation of the paranasal symptomatic and asymptomatic populations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;104:480-83.
  3. Ostiomeatal complex risk factors for sinusitis: CT evaluation. J Otolaryngol 1991;20(6):419-24.
  4. Coronal CT scan abnormalities in children with chronic sinusitis. Laryngoscope 1993;103:985-90.
  5. Clinical implications of the uncinate process in paranasal sinusitis: Radiologic evaluation. Am J Rhinol 1995;9:131-35.
  6. participation of anatomical variations in ostiomeatal complex genesis of chronic rhinosinusitis, reviewed by computed tomography. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia 2001;67(4):489-95.
  7. Anatomical variations between aetiological correlation in CT and chronic rhinosinusitis. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia 2001;67(4):507-10.
  8. Documentation of variation in sinonasal anatomy by intraoperative nasal endoscopy. Laryngoscope 2000;110:229-35.
  9. Study of the anatomical variations in the middle meatus of patients with nasal complaints using endonasal flexible fiberoptic endoscopy. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia 2003;69(2):198-206.
  10. Sinugenic headache and nasal endoscopy. MJAFI 2003;59:121-24.
  11. On the drainage of the normal frontal sinus of man. Acta Otolaryngol 1967;63(2):176-81.
  12. Toward the understanding of sinonasal anatomical variations—a cadaveric study. Clin Rhinol Int J 2009;2(3):37-42.
  13. Nasal Accessory sinus in man. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1934.
  14. The surgical anatomy of the ethmoid labyrinth. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1929;34:376-410.
  15. Nasal sinuses: An anatomic and clinical consideration. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins 1942:75-76.
  16. CT of the paranasal sinuses: Study of control series in relation to endoscopic sinus surgery. J Laryngol Otol 1990;104:477-81.
  17. Paranasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities: CT analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 1991;101:56-64.
  18. Diseases of the nose, throat and ear for practitioners and students. Bristol, England: John Wright and Sons, 1927.
  19. The etiological role of concha bullosa in chronic sinusitis. Eur Radiol 1995;6(4):550-55.
  20. The prevalence of concha bullosa and it relationship to chronic sinonasal disease. Am J Rhinol 1989;3(1):11-12.
  21. Functional endoscopic approach to inflammatory sinus disease. Current perspectives and technique modifications. Am J Rhinology 1988;2:89-96.
  22. Imaging of inflammatory sinus disease. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1993;26:535-47.
  23. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: The Messerklinger technique. Philadelphia: BC Decker, 1991.
  24. Anatomic variation in pediatric chronic sinusitis: A CT study. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1996;29:75-91.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.