An International Journal Clinical Rhinology

Register      Login

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2011 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Use of Porous Polyethylene Implants in Nasal Reconstruction

Natasha Choudhury, Joe Marais

Keywords : Augmentation rhinoplasty,Medpor,Nasal reconstruction,Porous polyethylene

Citation Information : Choudhury N, Marais J. Use of Porous Polyethylene Implants in Nasal Reconstruction. Clin Rhinol An Int J 2011; 4 (2):63-70.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10013-1075

Published Online: 00-08-2011

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2011; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction

Patients undergoing complex rhinoplasty, following previous trauma or cartilage deteriorating disease processes, present a surgical challenge. The availability of septal cartilage maybe limited, and alternative graft materials should be considered.

Methods

A retrospective study of our experience using the porous polyethylene (Medpor®) implant in nasal reconstruction was conducted. The indications for surgery are reviewed and the surgical outcomes noted. We also review the literature on available nasal implants and discuss their advantages and disadvantages.

Results

A total of 22 Medpor® nasal implants were used for augmentation rhinoplasty over a 6 and half years period. Three patients experienced a surgical complication, including one slipped dorsal implant, and two patients with graft extrusion. Both of these two patients had concomitant disease processes that would have resulted in a poor tissue microenvironment, which may have contributed to their graft failures.

Conclusion

In our experience, the Medpor® implant has proved very successful in patients requiring complex rhinoplasty, in a normal host tissue microenvironment.


PDF Share
  1. Implant site infection rates with porous and dense materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1979 13(1):101-08.
  2. Craniofacial applications for the Medpor porous polyethylene flexblock implant. J Craniofac Surg 1992;3(2):101-07.
  3. Craniofacial reconstruction with high density porous polyethylene implants. J Craniofac Surg 2004;15(5):719-24.
  4. Orbital reconstruction using porous polyethylene sheets. Opthalmology 1994;101:1697-708.
  5. Repair of fractures of the orbital floor with porous polyethylene implants. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;45(8):640-44.
  6. Medpor alternative for microtia repair. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2006;14(2):129-36.
  7. Reconstruction of congenital microtia-atresia: Outcomes with the Medpor/bone anchored hearing aid approach. Ann Plastic Surg 2009;62(4):384-89.
  8. Ear reconstruction with porous polyethylene implants. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2010;68:53-64.
  9. Nasal reconstruction using porous polyethylene implants. Facial Plast Surg 2000; 16(1): 55-61.
  10. Porous high-density polyethylene implants (Medpor) for nasal dorsal augmentation. Aesthetic Surg J 2000;20:26-30.
  11. Straightening the crooked middle third of the nose: Using porous polyethylene extended spreader grafts. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7(2):74-80.
  12. Correction of the crooked nose using custom made high density porous polyethylene extended spreader grafts. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2006;30(2):141-49.
  13. Grafts and implants in rhinoplasty and nasal reconstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1999;32:113-41.
  14. Implants in rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 1997;13:90.
  15. Biocompatability in selection of materials for implantation. J Biomed Mater Res 1970;4:341-56.
  16. Early tissue infiltrate in porous polyethylene implants into bone: A scanning electron microscope study. J Biomed Mater Res 1975;9:537-42.
  17. An evaluation of bone growth into porous high density polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res 1976;1:311-23.
  18. Silicone in nasal augmentation rhinoplasty: A decade of clinical experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:1230-37.
  19. Silicone implant in augmentation rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 2002;49:495-99.
  20. Nasal augmentation using Gore-Tex: A 10-year experience. Arch Facial Plast Surg 1999;1:118-21.
  21. Applications of Gore- Tex implants in rhinoplasty re-examined after 17 years. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008;10:224-31.
  22. Reconstruction of the major saddle nose deformity using composite alloimplants. Facial Plast Surg 1998;14(2):151-57.
  23. Use of porous polyethylene as nasal dorsal implants in Asians. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2006;8(2):102-06.
  24. Use of porous high-density polyethylene in revision rhinoplasty and in the platyrrhine nose. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1998;22(3):211-21.
  25. Aesthetic and functional restoration using dorsal saddle shaped Medpor implant in secondary rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 2008;60(6): 600-03.
  26. Reconstruction of traumatic nasal deformity in Orientals. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63(2):257-64.
  27. Management of the severe bulbous nasal tip using porous polyethylene alloimplants. Facial Plast Surg 2003;19(4):341-48.
  28. The role of alloplastic skeletal modification in the reconstruction of facial burns. Ann Plast Surg 1993;30:531-36.
  29. Reconstruction of saddle nose deformities using porous polyethylene implant. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1998;22:38-41.
  30. Porous polyethylene implants for nasal reconstruction: Clinical and histological studies. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1999;23:395-402.
  31. The use of alloplastic materials in rhinoplasty surgery: A meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121(3):85e-92e.
  32. Vascular changes in the nasal submucosa of chronic cocaine addicts. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1990;11(2):136-43.
  33. Nasal toxicity of cocaine: A hypercoagulable effect. J Natl Med Assoc. 2000;92:39-41.
  34. The cocaine user: The potential problem patient for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86(3): 436-42.
  35. Wegener's granulomatosis: A challenging disease for otorhinolaryngologists. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2005;125(10):1105-10.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.