Clinical Rhinology

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2018 ) > List of Articles


A Case of Mistaken Inflammatory Pseudotumor

Steven K Dennis, Kevin J Caceres, William C Yao

Keywords : Biologic therapy, Corticosteroids, Invasive fungal sinusitis, Inflammatory myofibroblastic pseudotumor, Inflammatory pseudotumor

Citation Information : Dennis SK, Caceres KJ, Yao WC. A Case of Mistaken Inflammatory Pseudotumor. Clin Rhinol An Int J 2018; 11 (1):21-24.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10013-1337

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-09-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; The Author(s).


Aim: Inflammatory myofibroblastic pseudotumor (IMT), part of the inflammatory pseudotumor (IPT) family, shares many presenting features with more common expansile sinonasal masses and is unlikely to be diagnosed without clinical suspicion. Background: Inflammatory myofibroblastic pseudotumor (IMT) is histologically characterized by myofibroblasts with prominent small lymphocytes and plasma cells, often initially mistaken for other inflammatory processes. These lesions share characteristics of pseudotumors and neoplasms with possible malignant potential. Case description: We present the case of a 57-year-old woman who was eventually properly diagnosed with IMT. She initially presented with several month histories of severe right-sided headache, facial pain, blurry vision, and right lid ptosis. The patient was diagnosed with invasive fungal sinusitis by another provider but proved nonresponsive to intravenous antifungal therapy. Repeat biopsy revealed an inflammatory process consistent with IMT. The lesion was rapidly responsive to intravenous steroid therapy. Conclusion: A destructive sinonasal mass necessitates a wide differential diagnosis that should include IPT. Both medical and multimodal treatment strategies have proven highly efficacious with a high cure rate and a higher rate of tumor stabilization. Clinical significance: IMT is an example of a commonly misdiagnosed pathology even with permanent section analysis by several pathologists. Early identification of this condition can lead to better treatment with medical therapeutic options and minimize unnecessary interventions.

PDF Share
  1. Desai SV, Spinazzi EF, Fang CH, et al. Sinnasal and Ventral Skull Base Inflammator Pseudotumor: A Systematic Review. The Laryngoscope 2015;125:813-821.
  2. Lai LM, McCarville MB, Kirby P, et al. Shedding light on inflammatory pseudotumor in children: spotlight of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Pediatric Radiology, Published online:12 May 2015.
  3. Soysal V, Yigitbasi OG, Kontas O, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the nasal cavity: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2001;61:161- 165.
  4. Tao J, Zhou ML, Zhou SH. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors of the head and neck. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8(2):1604-1610.
  5. Huang WH, Dai YC. Inflammatory Pseudotumor of the nasal cavity. Am J Otolaryngol 2006;27:275-277.
  6. Devaney KO, LaFeir DJ, Triantafyllou A, et al., Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors of the head and neck: evaluation of clinicopathologic and prognostic features. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012;269(12):2461-2465.
  7. Butrynski JE, D'Adamo DR, Hornick JL, et al., Crizotinib in ALK-Rearranged Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor. New Eng J Med 2010;363(18):1727-1733.
  8. Ponikau JU, Sherris DA, Kern EB, et al., The diagnosis and incidence of allergic fungal sinusitis. Mayo Clin Proc 1999;74(9):877-884.
  9. Catten MD, Murr AH, Goldstein JA, et al., Detection of fungi in the nasal mucosa using polymerase chain reaction. Laryngoscope 2001;111(3):399-403.
  10. Park SB, Lee JH, Weon YC. Imaging Findings of Head and NEck Inflammatory Pseudotumor. Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:1180-1186.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.