An International Journal Clinical Rhinology

Register      Login

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2017 ) > List of Articles


A Study on Clinical Profile of Deviated Nasal Septum and to determine the Efficacy of the Surgery

Mohan Mogarnad, Vandana Mohta

Keywords : Clinical profile,Deviated nasal septum,Likert scale,Septoplasty

Citation Information : Mogarnad M, Mohta V. A Study on Clinical Profile of Deviated Nasal Septum and to determine the Efficacy of the Surgery. Clin Rhinol An Int J 2017; 10 (2):70-73.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10013-1311

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 01-12-2009

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; The Author(s).



To study the clinical profile of deviated nasal septum and to assess the subjective efficacy of the surgical outcome using Likert scale.

Materials and methods

This study is a prospective, observational, single-center study from October 2013 to May 2015. The study was conducted in Sri Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkur, Karnataka, India. A detailed clinical history was taken and clinical examination of the patient was carried out. Sixty symptomatic patients were taken up. Patient scored their symptom-related severity using a Likert scale preoperatively. All patients underwent conventional septoplasty. Postoperatively, their symptoms were scored on 30th, 45th, and 90th day.


Preoperative and Postoperative values were analyzed. Statistically significant improvement was observed in the entire population: Nasal obstruction (p<0.001), headache (p<0.001), nasal discharge (p<0.001), facial pain (p<0.001), and hyposmia (p<0.001). Patient satisfaction was high and they used fewer nasal medications.


After surgical correction of the septum and analysis of the subjective scale, i.e., Likert scale showed improvement in all symptoms. The principal benefits of septal surgery relate to improvement in nasal symptoms.

How to cite this article

Mogarnad M, Mohta V. A Study on Clinical Profile of Deviated Nasal Septum and to determine the Efficacy of the Surgery. Clin Rhinol An Int J 2017;10(2):70-73.

  1. Septoplasty outcome using SNOT-22 questionnaire study. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2013 May-Jun;6(5): 34-38.
  2. An endoscopic approach to the deviated nasal septum – a preliminary study. J Laryngol Otol 1998 Oct;112(10):934-939.
  3. Classification of nasal septal deviation – relation to sinonasal pathology. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005 Jul-Sep;57(3):199-201.
  4. Submucous resection vs septoplasty: complications and functional outcome in adult patients. Gomal J Med Sci 2011 Jan-Jun;9(1):23-27.
  5. Comparative evaluation of conventional vs endoscopic septoplasty for limited septal deviation and spur. J Larynogol Otol 2009 Jul;123(7):737-741.
  6. Nasal septal deformities in ear, nose and throat patients: an international study. Am J Otolaryngol 2008 Mar-Apr;29(2):75-82.
  7. Nasal septla deviation and external deformity: A correlative study of 100 cases. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012 Oct-Dec;64(4):312-318.
  8. Outcomes of septoplasty in young adults: the nasal obstruction septoplasty effectiveness study. Am J Otolaryngol 2010 May-Jun;31(3):189-192.
  9. Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004 Mar;130(3):283-290.
  10. Patient views on information given before septoplasty, their expectations and outcomes. Darlington County Med J 2009/2010;3(2):30-32.
  11. Nasal septal surgery: evaluation of symptomatic and general health outcomes. Clin Otolaryngol 2001 Oct;26:367-370.
  12. . Does nasal septal surgery improve quality of life? Acta Otolaryngol 2006 Jul;126(7):752-757.
  13. Clinical outcomes for the surgical treatment of sinonasal headache. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003 Sep;129(3):217-221.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.